The Fee Schedule is set to be cut 29% on January 1st, 2012, unless the Congress again intervenes. Physical therapists and physicians are annually whiplashed by uncertainty to the size and the timing of the cuts.
While Vern Buchanan is in favor of aggressively cutting the 12% of discretionary spending that will have minimal effects on future years' spending, he is non-committal on Medicare.
Does the pattern of campaign donations from doctors in the 2009 - 2010 election cycle have anything to do with his voting record?
| American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons | $10,000 |
| American College of Cardiology | $2,500 |
| American Dental Association | $4,000 |
| American Medical Association | $2,000 |
| American Dental Association | $4,000 |
| College of American Pathologists | $3,000 |
| National Community Pharmacists Association | $2,000 |
A law stabilizing the size and timing of the annual Medicare cut at negative 1% would be, in effect, a cost of doing business - just like my annual 1-3% cost-of-living adjustments I pay my employees or my annual 15% increase in health insurance premiums I still provide. These are anticipated costs that I prepare and budget for.
Why not Medicare, too?
Vern Buchanan can act like a leader by cutting spending that will have a real effect on future years. He needs to cut discretionary and non-discretionary spending (Medicare) equally.
Don't just be for the Docs.
