The project Developing Outpatient Therapy Payment Alternatives (DOTPA) has issued these evaluation forms as 'prototypes' - presumably for provider input.
The proposed evaluation forms are available from the Research Triangle International (RTI) website - get the eval and discharge for institutional settings (eg: nursing facilities) (25 pages) and for community based settings (eg: PTPP).
The outpatient PT discharge note is only 16 pages. Yippee!
The point of this new 'provider burden' is to change the Medicare payment system to a 'value based' system where physical therapists are paid based on the 'risk adjusted' complexity of the patients we see.
For example, if you see a 75-year old patient with the following:
- lower back pain
- high fear avoidance beliefs
- depression
- lives alone
- smokes and drinks alcohol
- appears to have limited understanding/awareness of their health condition and its possible outcomes
I say may because no one knows what this alternative payment system will look like.
Currently, the OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) outcome data does not appear to show outcomes ranked by risk factor.
The most relevant outcome for outpatient care - number of visits - is obviously not as relevant to home health care so we couldn't expect guidance on number of visits.
Utilization outcomes for OASIS instead look at the following:
- Received Emergency Care
- Discharged (home) from Home Health Care
- Admitted to an Acute Care Hospital
...of the home health care patients treated in Florida treated between June 2007 and June 2008:I have a few questions for RTI before they recommend that Medicare implement a 17-page OASIS-style eval/discharge assessment in outpatient physical therapy.
- 46% improved in their ability to walk
- 27% were re-hospitalized
- 17% went to the emergency room prior to discharge
- What is 'improved'?
- How far did they walk?
- How fast did they walk?
- Are they satisfied with their home health care?
- How long did the episode of care last?
- How much did it cost?
